Browse articles
Where there’s a Will: The Responsibilities of the Auditor-Controller
Nevada County Auditor-Controller Gina Will declined requests for a full accounting of Measure V expenses, including staff time, citing no timekeeping records. She advised the Board of Supervisors could authorize an independent forensic audit. Prior officials noted incomplete project tracking through the Office of Emergency Services.
Sue Hoek: Should She be Trusted with Taxpayer Dollars?
Sue Hoek and the budget subcommittee approved OES funds later used to promote Measure V. Nevada County admitted seven FPPC violations and a $31,500 fine paid by taxpayers. That is a breach of fiscal trust and illegal. Hoek should resign.
Hardy Bullock Backed Measure V Settlement Later Disputes FPPC Findings
Supervisor Hardy Bullock joined a 5-0 July vote accepting Nevada County’s FPPC Measure V settlement and $31,500 penalty, then publicly rejected those findings. A 2022 court had already ordered emotional ballot language removed before the mailers.
The Grand Jury Just Issued a Second Warning Nevada County Cannot Ignore
Nevada County’s unfunded pension liability nearly doubled from $117 million in 2015 to $223.6 million in 2024, with no reduction plan despite warnings. Consequently, the Grand Jury criticize County leadership passivity amid rising compensation and calls for urgent structural reforms.
Open Letter to BOS: Lessons from 2010—Balancing Nevada County’s Budget Amid 2025 Federal Cutbacks
Nevada County Board of Supervisors must correct past mistakes by burdening taxpayers with excessive compensation packages and delayed fiscal reforms. We have the opportunity—and the responsibility—to rebuild our county government that is leaner, more responsive, and focused squarely on delivering essential services with transparency and fiscally conservative prudence.